Karlyn Borysenko says she infiltrated and recorded a Chicago Teachers Union call where a participant called for violent revolution and the fall of the U.S. government.
Borysenko, who describes herself as an anti-communist analyst, says the online meeting included Chicago union members, student activists, and teachers in France. She also claims American and French union participants were coordinating. The language she highlighted went far beyond ordinary disagreement over school policy, including references to destruction and killing.
One student activist on the call said, “The United States Government must fall.” Borysenko presented that statement as evidence of an effort to overturn the existing political system. The same discussion also included a call for people to follow the example of unrest in France. The speaker added, “There must be a willingness to kill.”
The material also features a man identified as a Chicago Public Schools employee who is described as advocating revolutionary politics. That detail adds a public education dimension to the allegation. However, the account does not establish whether the man was speaking for his employer, acting in an official role, or expressing only his own views.
Borysenko tied the American discussion to unrest in France. In her interpretation, the French movement was not mainly about school conditions or an ordinary protest. She described it as a communist effort to replace the capitalist government with a worker-controlled government. A separate clip shared alongside that argument showed a person in France describing themselves as socialist, communist, and anti-capitalist while saying the existing system should be dismantled.
The source frames these events as part of a larger attempt by communist movements to weaken Western institutions from within. What remains unproven is whether the excerpts reflect official union policy, a coordinated international campaign, or personal views expressed by individuals connected to the call.
Why It Matters
This matters because the alleged comments sit at the intersection of political activism, organized labor, and public education. Chicago educators, students, families, and taxpayers could all be affected by how the recording is understood. If people connected to a public school system were advocating violence, the concern would be serious. If the material is presented without enough context, reputations and public trust could also suffer.
The key distinction is between an individual’s words and an institution’s position. A call hosted by a union may include participants with different roles and opinions, but that alone does not show the union adopted their views. The material described here leaves that question open, along with whether the person identified as a school employee was speaking privately or in any official capacity.
Borysenko’s comparison with France broadens the stakes by suggesting an ideological connection across national borders. The source does not independently establish the scope, structure, or reach of that connection. Readers are left with a serious allegation and selected statements that require careful separation between documented participation and interpretation. That unresolved gap is central to judging what the call actually represented.
Source: The Liberty Daily
